Welcome to the blog of Dr Garvan Ellison, PhD, the internationally acclaimed scientific writer and blogger, and author of the famous paper "The science of embalming: affirming a Christian perspective in death."
Young Earth Creationist, Biblical Geocentrist, and not ashamed to admit it!!
Tuesday, 3 January 2012
Mighty row with so-called "scientist" from....
... ANGLIA RUSKIN "UNIVERSITY"!!!!!!!!!!!
[EDITED]
So, no surprises that yours truly won a mighty argument re. evolution with a scientist from this university tonight at a local meeting of important community activists.
11
comments:
Yellowcat
said...
Garvan I really don't think that putting your fingers in your ears and shouting "LA LA LA I REFUSE TO BELIEVE IT LA LA LA" Counts as winning a debate. I certainly have never seen you demonstrate any intellectual ability that would enable you win a debate.
I do like your self referential joke about people from second-rate institutions claiming academic credibility, except of course your fake degree did not come from any institution did it.
Anglia Ruskin University is one of the largest universities in Eastern England and its history goes back to 1858.
Just to add that I suspect that Garvan's 'Mighty row' in which he 'won a mighty argument' is a fantasy that only ever existed in Garvan's mind and bears no relationship to actual events in the real world.
That could well apply to most of what Garvan posts, his grip on reality is rather tenuous, as is his own existence for that matter.
The argument did indeed happen. A few people started talking about how they had found a fossil that was 240 million years old, whereupon I interrupted them and told them that was impossible. A mighty argument about the age of the earth ensued, and people were amazed to learn that dinosaur tracks and human tracks existed were discovered in the same layer of sediment on the Paluxy River Bed. Most of them had never heard of it, and that shut them up, and the evolutionist scientist had no answer either. So there.
Good for you Garvan. Most of these people who claim to be from a scientific background are actually quite shocked when they are presented with hard and fast proof that the earth is not nearly as old as they think.
The reason your man hadn't heard of the Paluxy nonsense is probably because even most creationists have stopped pedalling it. "A few individuals continue to promote the Paluxy "man tracks" or alleged human tracks in pre-Tertiary rocks from other localities, but such claims are not considered credible by either mainstream scientists or major creationist groups. " http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy.html
OH MY FUCKING GOD BILL YOU FUCKHEAD NOW I AM REALLY PISSED YOU FUCKING COWARD>>>I KINDA THOUGHT HEY MAN MABYE HE JUST HAS NOT LOGGED ON IN A WHILE BUT REALLY YOUR JUST BEING A FUCKING COWARD>>I KNOW YOULL READ THIS.and garven those "track" were a hoax not even your god ken ham accepts them now..you learn somthing new every day garven..now you know that you did not really win that argument..
Bill you ignorant ape stop your stupid bleating I find you to be tiresome in the extreme.
I think that argf makes a very good point, any moderate and reasonable rational person such as myself is constantly amazed at the ignorance, crass stupidity, denial of reality and outright lying so freely indulged in by artless and boorish promoters of cretinism such as yourself and Garvan. Yours with all the respect you deserve*
* A level of respect less than that which I would give to D melanogaster.
I denated an eminent creationist from a top US university last night, and defeated them on evey point. He had nothing but empty rhetoric to offer.
As an aside - why are all creationists who venture online men? Do they not let the women in their lives use computers? I guess since they believe women shpuld be 'barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen' that must be the case.
11 comments:
Garvan I really don't think that putting your fingers in your ears and shouting "LA LA LA I REFUSE TO BELIEVE IT LA LA LA"
Counts as winning a debate.
I certainly have never seen you demonstrate any intellectual ability that would enable you win a debate.
I do like your self referential joke about people from second-rate institutions claiming academic credibility, except of course your fake degree did not come from any institution did it.
Anglia Ruskin University is one of the largest universities in Eastern England and its history goes back to 1858.
MEANWHILE BILL HAS NOT REARED HIS HEAD FOR A REPLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just to add that I suspect that Garvan's 'Mighty row' in which he 'won a mighty argument' is a fantasy that only ever existed in Garvan's mind and bears no relationship to actual events in the real world.
That could well apply to most of what Garvan posts, his grip on reality is rather tenuous, as is his own existence for that matter.
The argument did indeed happen. A few people started talking about how they had found a fossil that was 240 million years old, whereupon I interrupted them and told them that was impossible. A mighty argument about the age of the earth ensued, and people were amazed to learn that dinosaur tracks and human tracks existed were discovered in the same layer of sediment on the Paluxy River Bed. Most of them had never heard of it, and that shut them up, and the evolutionist scientist had no answer either. So there.
Good for you Garvan. Most of these people who claim to be from a scientific background are actually quite shocked when they are presented with hard and fast proof that the earth is not nearly as old as they think.
The reason your man hadn't heard of the Paluxy nonsense is probably because even most creationists have stopped pedalling it.
"A few individuals continue to promote the Paluxy "man tracks" or alleged human tracks in pre-Tertiary rocks from other localities, but such claims are not considered credible by either mainstream scientists or major creationist groups. "
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy.html
OH MY FUCKING GOD BILL YOU FUCKHEAD NOW I AM REALLY PISSED YOU FUCKING COWARD>>>I KINDA THOUGHT HEY MAN MABYE HE JUST HAS NOT LOGGED ON IN A WHILE BUT REALLY YOUR JUST BEING A FUCKING COWARD>>I KNOW YOULL READ THIS.and garven those "track" were a hoax not even your god ken ham accepts them now..you learn somthing new every day garven..now you know that you did not really win that argument..
Even Answers In Genesis recommend you don't use the Paluxy river bed as an argument for creationism, since it's a well known hoax.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answers/topic/arguments-we-dont-use
Garvan perhaps you should ban this "agrf" poster? He seems like a very unpleasant person, and has a foul mouth and a dirty mind as well.
Bill you ignorant ape stop your stupid bleating I find you to be tiresome in the extreme.
I think that argf makes a very good point, any moderate and reasonable rational person such as myself is constantly amazed at the ignorance, crass stupidity, denial of reality and outright lying so freely indulged in by artless and boorish promoters of cretinism such as yourself and Garvan.
Yours with all the respect you deserve*
* A level of respect less than that which I would give to D melanogaster.
I denated an eminent creationist from a top US university last night, and defeated them on evey point. He had nothing but empty rhetoric to offer.
As an aside - why are all creationists who venture online men? Do they not let the women in their lives use computers? I guess since they believe women shpuld be 'barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen' that must be the case.
Post a Comment