Is evolution *really* science?

A good creation-evolution debate was held last night on the yahoo chat rooms, and I am pleased to report it was a clear victory for the creationists involved (including my good self).

But the key move was made by an old cyber-pal of mine, Dan from Toronto, who said this:

In order to qualify as 'scientific', a hypothesis must be capable of being tested. That means that it must not only be capable of being observed, but also it must be falsifiable. Yet in spite of a century and a half of this theory doing the milkrounds, not one evolutionist has devised a test which is capable of falsifying the theory of evolution. Thus the theory of evolution is not true science at all. In fact, it is much more akin to holding blind religious faith.

Not a single evolutionist had an answer to THAT. Well argued, Dan my friend. So if evolution should be taught is science class, so should creationism. Either both or science or neither is science.

Merry Christmas

Wishing all my contributors, past, present and future and very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

Just remember JESUS is the REASON for the SEASON.

Rabbit Butcher joins Hitchens in Hell

And so, Kim-jong-il, or whatever his name is, has been struck down dead by the Lord, and promptly despatched to Hell to join other recent occupants, such as Christopher Higgins and Elizabeth Taylor.

I detested this man since I read of his butchery of ten beautiful rabbits a few years ago.

http://www.theweek.co.uk/people-news/kim-jong-il/43754/giant-rabbits-and-virgin-blood-krazy-world-kim-jong-il

Well, the irony is the offspring of those rabbits will now be eating the carrots and greens of the fields whilst King Jesus roasts that warmongerer on a hot skewer over the coals of HELL.

(Well said Sen. John McCain!!!!)http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/kim-jong-il-is-in-a-warm-corner-of-hell-159430

Eminent paper rejected :(

I regret to announce that my paper, "Why the Large Hadron Collider is an extremely bad and expensive idea", has been rejected by the journal Physics Letters.

I was downtrodden about this for several days, as a huge amount of work went into it. But lo and behold, I did then read this:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16222710

If a gentleman by the name of Professor Peter Higgs had his theory rejected, then perhaps there is yet hope for yours truly. Following in Professor Peter Higgs footsteps (even though I do not believe the Higgs boson actually exists), the paper has now been sent to the journal "Physical Review Letters". So fingers crossed!

Singer "Michael Bublé" is going to hell

The Lord did tonight reveal to me in a dream the true nature of this musical "artist". 'Nuff said really. He is Satan's servant.

Which came first, the seed or the plant???

We all know how evolutionists squirm when it comes to dealing with the "chicken and the egg" situation. We all know that life has to come from an egg, but likewise an egg has to come from a life. So evolutionists have devised something called "biogenesis explanatory theory" that attempts to reconcile this biological impossibility.

BUT what evolutionists have not exactly been honest about is that their so-called "explanation" cannot apply to plants and seeds. Seeds are spawned from the plant, but without the plant there can be no life in the first place.

It is clear to me that the only logical explanation is that the first seed had to be planted by something or someone. I know who that someone was. His name is JESUS.

Have the evolutionists got any satisfactory, alternative explanation???? Answers on a postcard please...

Oh dear...

Oh dear! Dr Ellison has only gone and STORMED OUT of the treatment facility after a MIGHTY ROW with his doctor. This is not good news, not good news at all.

Dr Ellison unwell

It is with great regret that I must report that Dr Ellison is currently very unwell following a recent incident and is going into hospital today for treatment. He passes on his regards and hopes to be with you all again soon.